NovaInspect

AI-Powered Inspection

From visual evidence to actionable reports.

Upload inspection video or imagery, let detection do the first pass, confirm findings by annotation, and generate the report — in one workflow, with the evidence attached at every step.

Inspection project — NH section review
Pothole · HighCrack · MediumAI detection · 2 findings · 1 pending review
Example findings extracted from the inspection frame
FindingSeverityChainage
Transverse crackMedium12+450
PotholeHigh12+620
Edge breakLow13+080
Illustrative interface — figures shown are examples, not live data.

Visual inspection platform

Inspection evidence that holds up to review

NovaInspect is built around the way inspection work is actually signed off: a finding is only as good as the evidence and the reviewer behind it.

AI-assisted, human-confirmed

Detection proposes; inspectors decide. Every finding carries the reviewer, the evidence frame and the annotation that produced it.

One structure for video and images

Frames pulled from video and standalone images enter the same project, so findings are comparable however the evidence was captured.

Report-ready by design

Findings, severity, location and evidence are recorded as data first, then composed into reports you can export and circulate.

Video to report

Turn inspection video into a structured report

Long survey runs become reviewable frames, detected findings and a report — without hand-scrubbing footage.

  1. Video upload
  2. Frame extraction
  3. Human annotation
  4. Report generation

Capture and prepare

Get long inspection runs into a reviewable form.

  • Video upload per project or section
  • Automatic frame extraction
  • Frame selection and filtering
  • Evidence frames retained with each finding

Detect and annotate

Model output and inspector judgement in the same pass.

  • Object and defect detection on extracted frames
  • Annotation on the exact frame under review
  • Inspection comments against each observation
  • Severity classification from your catalogue

Findings and reporting

From observation to a document someone can act on.

  • Finding management and review status
  • Report generation from confirmed findings
  • Exportable reports for circulation
  • Consistent structure across inspections

Image to report

Inspect image sets with the same rigour

For drone stills, handheld photos and site uploads, the path from image to finding to report is identical.

  1. Image upload
  2. AI analysis
  3. Annotation
  4. Report

Batch image inspection

Work through a set of images without losing context.

  • Single and multiple image upload
  • Inspection sets grouped by asset or location
  • AI-assisted image analysis
  • Evidence images attached to findings

Precise marking

Mark what you mean, at the geometry the defect needs.

  • Bounding boxes for discrete defects
  • Polygon annotations for irregular areas
  • Point annotations for single locations
  • Labels drawn from your defect list

Classification and output

Consistent labelling is what makes reporting comparable.

  • Comments against each annotation
  • Severity applied per finding
  • Finding lists per asset or section
  • Report generation and export

Annotations

Annotation is how inspection becomes data

Each mark carries geometry, a classification and a severity — which is what turns a reviewed image into a queryable, reportable record.

  • Bounding box

    Rectangular extent around a discrete defect or object.

  • Polygon

    Irregular area such as a patch, spall or delamination.

  • Polyline

    Linear features — cracks, joints, cable runs, kerb lines.

  • Point

    Single-location marks for assets, samples or observations.

  • Freehand

    Traced outlines for shapes a polygon cannot follow cleanly.

  • Measurement

    Lengths, widths and areas captured alongside the annotation.

  • Text / comment

    Inspector notes attached to the exact evidence frame.

  • Defect classification

    Label and severity applied from your own defect catalogue.

From a mark on an image to a structured finding

Annotations are stored against the asset and location they describe, so findings can be grouped, filtered, compared between inspections and exported without re-reading the imagery.

  • Geometry retained with the annotation, not flattened into the image
  • Classification and severity from your own catalogue
  • Comments preserved for the review trail
  • Findings grouped by asset, section or inspection run

Example finding record

Asset / section
NH-53 · Section 4
Location
Chainage 12+620
Annotation
Bounding box (frame 0142)
Classification
Pothole
Severity
High
Evidence
Extracted frame + source video reference
Reviewer
Confirmed by inspector

Illustrative record — fields are configured per inspection programme.

AI / ML model training

Models trained on your inspections, not someone else's

Annotation work feeds training, training produces versioned models, and corrected findings feed the next version.

  1. Dataset

    Collect the imagery and frames that represent the conditions you inspect.

  2. Annotation

    Label the dataset using the same annotation tools inspectors use daily.

  3. Dataset validation

    Check label consistency and coverage before anything is trained on it.

  4. Model training

    Train a model version against the validated training dataset.

  5. Model evaluation

    Score the version on a held-out set and record precision and recall.

  6. Model version

    Keep versions with their dataset, parameters and evaluation results.

  7. Deployment

    Promote a version so new inspections run inference against it.

  8. Continuous improvement

    Feed corrected findings back into the dataset for the next version.

Dataset management

Annotation datasets and training datasets are managed separately, so what a model learned from stays traceable.

Model versions

Each version records its training status, dataset and evaluation run — no guessing which model produced a finding.

Evaluation and inference

Precision and recall are reported per version against your own evaluation set, then inference runs on new inspections.

We do not publish blanket accuracy figures. Performance depends on the dataset, defect classes and capture conditions of each programme, and is reported per model version against your own evaluation set.

Road inspection

MoRTH-aligned road inspection workflows

Designed to support MoRTH-oriented road inspection and reporting practice, with chainage-based evidence for every defect raised.

  • Road condition inspection from video or images
  • Pavement defect identification and classification
  • Crack detection and extent marking
  • Pothole identification with evidence frames
  • Road-surface assessment by section
  • Road asset inspection alongside surface defects
  • Chainage-based location for every finding
  • Compliance-oriented inspection reporting
Road corridor being surveyed for condition assessment

Project to report, by chainage

State road programmes are organised by project, section and chainage — for example a Chhattisgarh road project — so every finding resolves to a point on the network.

  1. Project
  2. Road section
  3. Chainage
  4. Captured evidence
  5. Detected defect
  6. Annotation
  7. Finding
  8. Report

Novametrics builds inspection workflows aligned to MoRTH-oriented reporting practice. Applicable standards, thresholds and acceptance criteria are configured from the specifications your authority issues — we do not substitute our own.

Ready to turn visual data into actionable intelligence?

Bring us a section of road, a building portfolio or an inspection backlog, and we will show you the NovaInspect workflow against your own evidence.

Talk to NovaMetrics